|
2023-07-10 17:30 developer |
BTS_15.537.56_PushAgentService.apk.jpg (206,833 bytes) |
|
|
Hi YK, The ATV10, 15.536.60 (self-build) also has this warning. Thanks, Jason |
|
|
Hi Jason I reported it to SKB https://jira.skbroadband.com/browse/BPM-20441 I will let you know if there is any update. Thank you YK.Jung |
|
|
Hi Jason Regarding PushAgent, the PushAgent developer doesn't know how to solve it. So he is asking for additional information. 1) Please check and share the information about "See more information..." at the bottom of the captured screen. 2) Are there any additional clues to solve this issue? 3) Can you check with Google or 3PL if this warning is already a known issue? Thank you YK.jung |
|
|
Hi YK, 1) Please check the attachment MBA1 and MBA2 2) In MBA2, Maybe they can check "Requesting the permission at runtime through the permission request guidance" https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/permissions/overview?dangerous-permission-prompt 3) I don't know how to ask, Do you know what permissions the app uses or what sensitive data the app collects? Thanks, Jason MBA1.jpg (234,192 bytes) |
|
|
Hi Jason >> 3) Can you check with Google or 3PL if this warning is already a known issue? >3) I don't know how to ask, Do you know what permissions the app uses or what sensitive data the app collects? Can this BTS warning be treated as known issue? ( as far as I know, if it is a known issue, there is no need to fix it. ) Or is this warning a situation that must be solved? Please check it with 3PL Thank you YK.Jung |
|
|
Hi YK, >>Please check it with 3PL Our other customers don't have PushAgentService, so they don't have this warning. Only SKB product have this warning. if you want to check if this warning is known issue with 3PL. The 3PL will asked us to provide what sensitive data the app collects? they needs more information to confirm. Please give us more information about the main function of PushAgentService and what sensitive data the app collects. Thanks, Jason |
|
|
Hi Jason The PushAgentService generates the "STB Device UUID" The "STB Device UUID" uses the STB ID/DeviceID/SimSerialNumber when it is created. So Sensitive datas are STB ID/DeviceID/SimSerialNumber Is it possible to contact 3PL based on this information? Thank you YK.Jung |
|
|
Hi YK, STB ID => What's this? DeviceID => Do you mean getprop ro.boot.deviceid SimSerialNumber => Do you mean getprop ro.boot.serialno or getprop ro.serialno Did they try "Requesting the permission at runtime through the permission request guidance" Before we asking 3PL, I think we should try it first. Thanks, Jason |
|
|
Hi Jason - STB ID : This STB ID seems unnecessary to mention as an ID managed by SKB DeviceID and SimSerialNumber are values obtained from TelephonyManager - SimSerialNumber : ICCID (Integrated Circuit Card Identifier) - DeviceId : As described below in the Framework > Returns the unique device ID of phone, for example, the IMEI for GSM and the MEID for CDMA phones. Return null if device ID is not available Currently, SKB has not yet completed the review of the contents. First , please check whether the warning is simply a known issue or not Thanks YK.Jung |
|
|
Hi YK, We/3PL are not able to confirm if this is known issue, because this warning only happen on SKB's app, so there is no reference case. I've checked the latest FW (15.540.16), we still have this BTS warning. Please check the following information 15.537.60 BTS version: 2023-07-10T11:36:42.127409Z 15.540.16 BTS version: 2023-07-20T13:05:24.362019Z Google update BTS recently, I think if this warning is known warning, Google would have fixed it in these weeks, but we still can see this warning in recent days. I think the owner should implement the "Requesting the permission at runtime through the permission request guidance" first. I'll help them verify it. Thanks, Jason |
|
|
Hi Jason, SKB wants official response from SKB. Please ask it to 3PL and share their response. Thanks. |
|
|
Hi YK, I want to help you ask it, but Does 3rd party try the "Requesting the permission at runtime through the permission request guidance" Before we asking 3PL, I think 3rd party should try it first. The information is mentioned in the link "See more information..." that I've provided, has the owner check it? if I asked 3PL. 3PL will said does 3rd party check it? Thanks, Jason |
|
|
hi jason, In fact, the 3rd party contract period has expired and can no longer be supported. And if you get a response from 3PL saying "Third party check first", please share it with us. I think we can deliver our request to skb using the official reply. Also, we are trying to keep you out of work as much as possible. This is what we ask of you when we can't solve it in our hands. I hope you know that. Thanks, KANG, |
|
|
Hi Wooshin, You didn't tell me that SKB's contract with a 3rd party had ended, so 3rd party can not try it. OK, I'll ask it. Thanks, Jason |
|
|
Hi Wooshin, I've asked our 3PL, Why is this MBA warning not set as an exemption. He replied us that we don't need to care about the MBA warning for TV device even though this warning is not set as an exemption. I think Intek can ask their 3PL to reconfirm this case. Thanks, Jason |
|
|
Hi Jason, Thanks for you support. If there is no issue, close this ticket. Thanks. |
|
|
Hi Wooshin, OK, Please also refer to https://mantis.cnsbg.foxconn.com/vaas/view.php?id=1504 MBA Polices will eventually be enforced on TV. if SKB has contract issue, please also let SKB know this risk. Thanks, Jason |
- yk.jung ( (ALTech) Younkwang Jung ) developer
